ArtPrize 2011 Revisited


With over 1,500 pieces, ArtPrize 2011 lured me in for another look.  This time I took my husband who is quite evolved for a Michigan outdoorsman, although not appreciative of the more abstract art forms, the pieces that you cannot exactly say what it is because it is something different to each viewer.  So I plied him with a tasty lunch and a microbrew before we looked and then topped off our outing with one for the road at an Irish pub in Downtown Grand Rapids.  Included in this post are a few more photos of some of the pieces we admired.

Now that the top ten have been chosen by voters throughout the community the art critics are complaining about some of the “amateurish” pieces and the entire voting process.  How could common folk who have not been formally trained possibly know which are the best pieces?  ArtPrize  is advertised as a social experiment designed to promote connections between artists and the community (common folk) and inspire creative conversations.  What I observed was families with children and classes of schoolchildren viewing the art downtown.  Many of the people dressed in jeans and t-shirts and the price to get in to view the art was zilch.  ArtPrize made art accessible, which is what most deserves an award.  Kudos to Rick DeVos, the founder of ArtPrize, for his response to the critics’ assertion that ArtPrize lacks credibility in the art community, “I just want to see crazy crap all over Grand Rapids, and I think we’ve achieved that,” DeVos said. “The goal is not to find better art through voting. It’s not better art through democracy.  The prize and the voting are really just mechanisms. It comes back to building a creative culture in West Michigan.”

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “ArtPrize 2011 Revisited

  1. We’re going to Artprize tomorrow and unfortunately can’t help select the top 10 since that’s already been done. I’d like to see the first round of voting extended next year to enable more people to get in on that. It does seem like “bigger is better” in terms of who the winners are and that isn’t necessary the the definition of art. Consider the “Mona Lisa”. I think less money to the top and include more artists in the prize money pot overall. After all, there is some truth to “starving artists”.

    • I hope you enjoy the art tomorrow. Yes, there is an obvious preference for the very large pieces, not sure why. Perhaps they make BIG impressions! I think the definition of art is unique to every individual. Keep in mind that in most contests artists have to pay a fee to show; ArtPrize operates in the red, more of a charitable venture that the businesses and winners profit from.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s